Music in New Jersey

A Public Musicology Project

  • Home
  • Public Musicology
    • Music in Princeton Blog
    • Oral Histories
  • Ecomusicology Conference
    • Conference Schedule
    • Call for Papers
  • Special Projects
    • The Past, Present and Future of Public Musicology
      • Conference Schedule
      • Call for Papers
    • Westminster Choir World Tour 1956-57 Exhibit and Podcast
    • Sounds of Princeton Exhibit and Soundwalks
  • About Music in New Jersey
    • About the Project Coordinator
    • Public Musicology at Westminster Choir College of Rider University

Talk the Talk

November 19, 2014 By griffithsa 1 Comment

imageDaily life is full of interactions, one-liners, and conversations. It never seems to dawn on us how often we communicate, both non-verbally and verbally. Our entire life is made up of a series of social interactions that more or less define our story. So naturally, I assumed that preparing for an oral history interview would be a walk in the park. Wrong.

Oral history is a fascinating but tricky game. It’s easy enough to come up with a list of questions to pummel the interviewee with, but finding a way to tease out the story without interfering or producing an artificial result is not as simple as one might think.  Because of this, I decided to approach my interview with Heather Jones of the Princeton Girlchoir in a more unstructured way. I created a series of topics, which were in themselves difficult to come up with, and led the conversation through these open-ended ideas. What was most difficult about writing these topics (and sticking to them) was that I had to ask my questions in way that wasn’t blatant or obvious. Even though there were times that I just wanted to ask something straight up, I knew that I had to bite my tongue: the issue, sometimes, with asking a straightforward question is that you get a short, succinct answer that mirrors the nature of your question. While this approach certainly works for particular types of research, I didn’t want a series of concise responses—I wanted to hear Heather’s story.

As if the prep work wasn’t sticky enough, I then had to think about production and the quality of the video footage. This may sound silly or over exaggerated (as if I’m Hitchcock looking for the perfect angle), but it truly is important to make sure that your production set-up provides the best possible frame for the story you’re recording. It doesn’t do anybody justice to have low-quality set-up that hinders and garbles the interviewee’s message. For my work with Heather, I purposefully chose to turn the camera only on her in order to deemphasize my role as the interviewer and to thereby get a more personalized story. All said this method seemed to work. (One thing I will say in terms of technology, though, is that you absolutely have to monitor it throughout the process. I was constantly up and down, making sure that the camera was still rolling. I think I might have had a slight breakdown if we’d gotten to the end and hadn’t gotten any footage.)

All logistics aside, what I learned most about oral history was that you have to choose your interviewee wisely. I know Heather on a professional level and knew that she would bring a great deal of poise to the process. In addition to wanting to hear her story, I chose her because of her articulate and straightforward nature. It was really such a joy to simply prompt her and then listen to her tell her story in such a well-thought-out and eloquent way. I absolutely think that the interview would have been inhibited if the interviewee was unduly curt or brief in his/her responses. I can imagine that it would be quite difficult as the interviewer to have to constantly poke and prod, rather than being able to enjoy and appreciate the message being expressed. Because of Heather’s intelligent, thoughtful comments, this interview went incredibly smoothly and made me feel not only more connected to the process of oral history, but also more connected to Heather herself. There really is a lot to be said for the human aspect of this research method. After all, without our stories our lives are just a blank page in someone else’s memoir.

See my full interview with Heather Jones here.

Share
Why Choral Music?
Initial Success and Subsequent Struggles with Starting an Open Mic Night at Cafe 44

Filed Under: Classical Music, Music and Ideas, Music in Princeton Blog Tagged With: Heather Jones, Oral History, Princeton Girlchoir

Trackbacks

  1. Heather Jones– General Manager of the Princeton Girlchoir says:
    November 28, 2014 at 1:47 pm

    […] Read Allie’s reflections on her interview with Heather Jones here. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RSS
Follow by Email
Facebook
Facebook
SHARE

Upcoming Ecomusicology Conference

Locations and Dislocations: An Ecomusicological Conversation

April 8-10, 2016 Westminster Choir College of Rider University Princeton, NJ "Locations and Dislocations: An Ecomusicological Conversation" seeks to bring together scholars, performers, and composers to further explore the relationships between music, culture, and the environment. The conference will tune to sounds as they fit or belong in the place they are heard, as they fit or belong in some other place, or as they have no ecological home, either built or natural. Among the questions at

Recent Posts

  • Cris Frisco– Tenor and Vocal Coach
  • Rob Tannen– Musical Impresario and Founder of SALON 33
  • Douglas Helvering– Composer, Music Theory and Composition Professor, and Church Music Director
  • Myles Glancy– Tour Manager for the American Boychoir
  • Rebecca Pennington– Administrative Director of the The New School for Music Study

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Add Link to Facebook

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Copyright © 2022 · Eric Hung, Associate Professor of Music History, Westminster Choir College of Rider University · Log in